User blogs
Top Architectural CAD Software
It was a solution to fix a problem. For years, architects would create their building plans using pen and paper. Then, they would build 3D models to illustrate their plans to clients. However, using pen and paper made it extremely difficult to catch errors in their plans. It also did not allow them to easily communicate their plans to construction managers and engineers. Enter computer-aided design or CAD.To get more news about architecture cad, you can visit shine news official website.
In many ways, CAD is the perfect solution because it allows architects to turn their hand drawings into 2D and 3D designs and quickly fix problems that emerge. However, with this solution, a new problem arose. Even if many architects start with pen and paper and later scan their drawings into CAD systems, they still need CAD software to design and communicate their plans to clients, engineers, and construction managers. But now there are so many systems on the market it is difficult to know which CAD solution for architects will work best for your needs and budget.
This is why we have compiled a list of 17 architectural CAD software solutions. We list solutions that range from free architectural CAD software to the most expensive architectural CAD software systems, along with the pros and cons of each. This is all so you can find the best architectural CAD software solution for your needs and budget.
What is CAD software?
Before we get into architectural CAD solutions, it is important to review CAD software basics. Now, if you are a seasoned architect, this is probably old news for you. However, if you are just getting started, it may be helpful to understand the genesis of CAD.
As mentioned above, CAD stands for computer-aided design. The foundation for CAD was laid by Dr. Patrick Hanratty in 1957. Hanratty created PRONTO, or Program for Numerical Tooling Operations. The purpose of PRONTO was to produce digital instructions needed to operate a machine tool. Though PRONTO was never widely used, nearly 70% of all CAD/CAM software on the market today use Hanratty’s original code.
Another big player in the development of CAD was Ivan E. Sutherland. Ivan E. Sutherland wrote a thesis at MIT in 1963 titled “Sketchpad: A Man-Machine Graphical Communications System.” This thesis allowed designers to create drawings directly on a Cathode Ray Tube, or CRT, using a light pen. A CRT is what is used to control electron beams and direct those beams to create an image on a TV screen or computer monitor.
The thesis went on to work out how those drawings could be stored, copied, and changed by designers. Finally, Sutherland helped create the algorithms needed to remove hidden lines in 3D drawings. This algorithm was key to developing the realistic renderings designers create today.
Though the foundation for CAD is over a half-century old, its adoption into the everyday design world didn’t happen immediately. Like the computer, the major advancements for CAD were developed in the 1980s (this was the decade that birthed AutoCAD®), and by the late 1990s, CAD adoption was widespread.
At its root, today’s CAD solutions create exact illustrations of 2D or 3D models as it simultaneously documents the design process. Today, CAD is used by engineers, graphic designers, textile designers, construction managers and, of course, architects.
First, the answer to question one: What is the difference between CAD software and architectural CAD software? The answer to this is simple. CAD serves engineers, designers, and architects and aids in the design of products, parts, and buildings. It can do a lot of things and ultimately serve many industries.
Architectural CAD software is designed to specifically serve architects, engineers, and contractors, or AEC professionals. It serves AEC professionals by replacing general lines, circles, and arcs with AEC objects. Additionally, many architectural CAD solutions either have BIM integrations or are CAD-BIM solutions.
BIM stands for Building Information Modeling and is important because it aids in the communication of AEC professionals for the duration of the project. If a change is made by a team on a BIM model, the changes and recalculations are immediately made across the board to all affected parts. This ensures that all AEC professionals are on the same page and this reduces time delays and potential errors.
The answer to the second question is important to understand because it will impact how much money you want to put into CAD software specific to architects. So, should architects use specialized software instead of normal CAD software?
The answer to this question is not as simple. Architectural CAD software is important to purchase. However, you will likely need both general-purpose CAD such as AutoCAD® or SketchUp® and specialized architectural CAD software. This is because the two solutions ultimately provide different—but needed—services.
Advisory warns of MedusaLocker RaaS-based model that depends upon observed split of ransom payments
U.S. agencies issued a joint cybersecurity advisory providing information on the MedusaLocker ransomware, including recent activity observed in May. The hackers predominantly rely on vulnerabilities in Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) to access victims’ networks, encrypt the victim’s data and leave a ransom note with communication instructions in every folder containing an encrypted file. The note directs victims to provide ransomware payments to a specific Bitcoin wallet address. To get more news about Robotics as a Service, you can visit glprobotics.com official website.
“MedusaLocker appears to operate as a Ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS) model based on the observed split of ransom payments, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), the Department of the Treasury, and the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), said in the latest advisory. “Typical RaaS models involve the ransomware developer and various affiliates that deploy the ransomware on victim systems. MedusaLocker ransomware payments appear to be consistently split between the affiliate, who receives 55 to 60 percent of the ransom, and the developer, who receives the remainder,” it added.
MedusaLocker relies predominantly on exploiting unpatched vulnerabilities in Remote Desktop Protocol to gain access to victims’ networks. It also frequently uses email phishing and spam email campaigns, with malware directly attached to the email, as initial intrusion vectors.
The agencies have asked organizations to mitigate cyber threats from ransomware, including prioritizing remediating known exploited vulnerabilities, training users to recognize and report phishing attempts, and enabling and enforcing multifactor authentication (MFA).
The advisory identified that the MedusaLocker ransomware hackers also frequently use email phishing and spam email campaigns, directly attaching the ransomware to the email, as initial intrusion vectors. “MedusaLocker ransomware uses a batch file to execute PowerShell script. This script propagates MedusaLocker throughout the network by editing the value within the infected machine’s registry, which then allows the infected machine to detect attached hosts and networks via Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMP) and to detect shared storage via Server Message Block (SMB) Protocol,” it added.
MedusaLocker “then restarts the LanmanWorkstationservice, which allows registry edits to take effect, kills the processes of well-known security, accounting, and forensic software, and restarts the machine in safe mode to avoid detection by security software. It also encrypts victim files with the AES-256 encryption algorithm; the resulting key is then encrypted with an RSA-2048 public key, and runs every 60 seconds, encrypting all files except those critical to the functionality of the victim’s machine and those that have the designated encrypted file extension.
It also establishes persistence, and attempts to prevent standard recovery techniques by deleting local backups, disabling startup recovery options, and deleting shadow copies, the advisory said.
MedusaLocker actors place a ransom note into every folder containing a file with the victim’s encrypted data, the joint advisory said. “The note outlines how to communicate with the MedusaLocker actors, typically providing victims with one or more email addresses at which the actors can be reached. The size of MedusaLocker ransom demands appears to vary depending on the victim’s financial status as perceived by the actors,” it added.
Some other mitigation techniques involved implementing a recovery plan that maintains and retains multiple copies of sensitive or proprietary data and servers in a physically separate, segmented, and secure location. Organizations can also implement network segmentation and maintain offline backups of data to ensure limited interruption, regularly back up data, and password-protect backup copies stored offline.
Additionally, they can install, regularly update, and enable real-time detection for antivirus software on all hosts, and review domain controllers, servers, workstations, and active directories for new and/or unrecognized accounts.
Commenting on the MedusaLocker ransomware alert, John Riggi, AHA’s National Advisor for Cybersecurity and Risk, said in a statement, “This joint agency advisory contains very detailed and actionable indicators of compromise. The advisory also highlights the danger of unsecured remote desktop protocol and phishing emails as the initial attack vector,” he added.
“The ‘ransomware as a service’ business model used by the MedusaLocker gang facilitates the continuing global proliferation of ransomware — even by relatively unsophisticated cyber actors,” according to Riggi. “It is strongly recommended that organizations continue to emphasize phishing email education for staff, exercise cyber incident response plans, and ensure the segregation and security of network and data backups, among the many helpful risk mitigation recommendations contained in the advisory,” he added.
Female 2022 World Cup referee Yamashita discusses breaking gender barrier
Yoshimi Yamashita admits that the “pressure is huge” as she prepares to make history by breaking down gender barriers at the 2022 World Cup, with the Japanese referee one of three women selected by FIFA to figure prominently at the finals in Qatar.To get more news about XemBD, you can visit xembd.cc official website.
Stephanie Frappart of France and Salima Mukansanga of Rwanda are the other female officials to have been included in an elite group of 36 that are in contention to take charge of games during the global gathering in the Middle East.
Yamashita is rightly proud of her standing within that pack – with three female assistant referees also included in pool of 69 there – but she acknowledges that the spotlight will be on those looking to drag football into the 21st century.No female referee has ever taken charge of a World Cup fixture in the long and distinguished history of the competition, with the history books about to be re-written in Qatar.
Yamashita has said of her role in that process – having previously officiated in the men’s J League and at the Tokyo Olympic Games: “Of course, I think the pressure is huge and I think I have a lot of responsibility.
“But I am really happy to take this duty and pressure, so I try to take it positively and I try to be happy.”She added: “One of the big goals as a referee is to bring out the attractiveness of soccer.
“So if I need to communicate with the players, I will do that. If I need to show a card, I will show a card. Rather than control, I’m thinking about what to do towards the big goal of bringing out the appeal of soccer.”Yamashita is well versed in the demands of officiating at an elite level, having also turned out in the Asian Champions League, but admits that the speed of the game can take some getting used to.
On the biggest challenges that she faces out in the middle, the 36-year-old Tokyo native said: “It’s the speed, but not just the players’ speed.Not the ball speed. It’s just the game speed. It means for me I have to make quicker decisions — more speed.”
Those qualities will be put to good use when the 2022 World Cup finals get underway on November 21, with the tournament running through to a finish on December 18.
FIFA should match $440m World Cup prize
FIFA should earmark at least $440m to provide remedy for the hundreds of thousands of migrant workers who have suffered human rights abuses in Qatar during preparations for the 2022 World Cup, Amnesty International said in a new report today, six months ahead of the tournament’s opening game.To get more news about VeboTV, you can visit vebobd.live official website.
In an open letter accompanying the report, Amnesty International and a coalition of human rights organizations, unions, and fan groups urged FIFA’s president Gianni Infantino to work with Qatar to establish a comprehensive remediation programme. As well as providing compensation for all labour abuses related to hosting the tournament in Qatar, they should ensure that abuses are not repeated, both in Qatar and in future tournaments.
To remedy the litany of abuses committed since 2010, when FIFA awarded hosting rights to Qatar without requiring any improvement in labour protections, the organizations called on FIFA to at least match the $440m it hands out in prize money at the World Cup.
“Given the history of human rights abuses in the country, FIFA knew?—or should have known?—the obvious risks to workers when it awarded the tournament to Qatar. Despite this, there was not a single mention of workers or human rights in its evaluation of the Qatari bid and no conditions were put in place on labour protections. FIFA has since done far too little to prevent or mitigate those risks,” said Agnès Callamard, Amnesty International’s Secretary General.
By turning a blind eye to foreseeable human rights abuses and failing to stop them, FIFA indisputably contributed to the widespread abuse of migrant workers involved in World Cup-related projects in Qatar, far beyond the stadiums and official hotels.”
The sum of $440 million is likely to be the minimum necessary to cover an array of compensation costs and to support initiatives to protect workers’ rights in the future, Amnesty International has estimated. However, the total sum for reimbursing unpaid wages, the extortionate recruitment fees paid by hundreds of thousands of workers, and compensation for injuries and deaths could end up being higher, and should be evaluated as part of a participatory process with unions, civil society organizatons, the International Labour Organization and others.
“While it may be too late to erase the suffering of past abuses, FIFA and Qatar can and should act to provide redress and prevent further abuses from taking place. Providing compensation to workers who gave so much to make the tournament happen, and taking steps to make sure such abuses never happen again, could represent a major turning point in FIFA’s commitment to respect human rights,” said Agnès Callamard.As expressed in the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, and recognized by its own policies, FIFA has a responsibility to remedy human rights abuses it has contributed to. This responsibility should cover not only workers building football-specific facilities such as stadiums and training sites, FIFA-accredited hotels and the broadcast centre, but also the services required to operate these facilities. It should also cover those workers involved in building and servicing the transport, accommodation and other infrastructure required to host more than a million visitors expected to travel to Qatar to watch the tournament.
Equally, Qatar is also obliged to ensure remedy for every abuse on its territory, whether linked to the World Cup or not. While there has been some progress through both the Supreme Committee for Delivery and Legacy’s initiatives and Qatar’s welcome programme of labour reforms, their respective limited scope and weak enforcement have meant that serious human rights abuses persist and migrant workers have had limited access to remedy. Ultimately, abuses suffered by workers over the past decade on all projects needed for this World Cup, have largely remained unaddressed.
“For years, the suffering of those who made this World Cup possible has been brushed under the carpet. It is about time FIFA and Qatar came together to work on a comprehensive remediation programme that puts workers at its centre and ensures that no harm remains unaddressed,” said Agnès Callamard.
Portugal Squad: 2022 FIFA World Cup
Portugal’s squad is the world’s best squad in FIFA as it has a huge chance of winning the 2022 FIFA World Cup in Qatar however it is a prediction for the tournament but we can’t skip the experienced players from the squad that make Portugal in different in the race.To get more news about VeboTV, you can visit vebobd.live official website.
As Portugal doesn’t have a shortage of talent in the squad in forwarding areas, Joao Felix, Bruno Fernandes, Diogo Jota, etc have made an impression in qualification rounds. Now the question is how many players Portugal will be allowed to take part in the 2022 FIFA World Cup.
Just working on new stuff and something big is on the way with my boys. In the 2022 Qatar World Cup team is placed 2022 FIFA World Cup Group H with Ghana, Uruguay, and South Korea. Cristiano Ronaldo will lead the team and Head coach Fernando Santos coach for Portugal.Portugal FIFA World Cup 2022 Squad Possible line-up(4-3-3):- Anthony Lopes (GK) , Nuno Mendes, Ruben Dias, Pepe, Joao Cancelo, Joao Moutinho, Bruno Fernandes, Bernardo Silva, Diogo Jota, Cristiano Ronaldo, Otavio. You can find here Brazil FIFA World Cup 2022 Squad list below.
5 players with the most assists for national team in 21st century
Constantly providing assists on a football pitch has never been an easy task. It has only gotten tough after the levels of defending have gone up across football.To get more news about VeboTV, you can visit vebobd.live official website.
There is a massive difference when it comes to creating goals at the club and national level. The amount of time available to get in sync with fellow countrymen is far less than that with club teammates.The football world has seen some amazing playmakers grace the game, showcasing their creativity on the pitch. But not all of them have been able to be that effective in creating goals at the national level.
Despite the different dynamics and challenges at the country level, some of the top playmakers have done really well. Here, we take a look at the footballers who have created the highest number of goals for their national team in the 21st century.Dusan Tadic has been in impressive form for Ajax since joining them in the 2018-19 season. The Serbian playmaker has been very instrumental in helping the club secure three league titles.
At the same time, the attacking midfielder has done equally well with the Serbian national team. Having made his international debut in 2008, Tadic became a regular starter after 2011.
The 33-year old played a massive role in helping Serbia qualify for the 2018 FIFA World Cup as he scored four goals and registered seven assists in the qualifying campaign.Riyad Mahrez was in sensational form last season for Manchester City as he has been for most of his career in England. The winger has a sweet left-foot and is capable of going past players with utter ease using his dribbling skills.
He is a regular for the Algeria national team and is currently the team's captain. Mahrez won the 2019 Africa Cup of Nations, contributing three goals in the competition.Since his debut in 2014, Mahrez has registered 27 assists in 75 national appearances. He averages 0.36 assists per game and is a vital player for the Algerian national team.
There are very few players in the football world who can make playmaking look as silky and smooth as Mesut Ozil. With his amazing passing range and vision, the German midfielder has made creating chances look effortlessly easy on the pitch.
He may not be at his best right now but Ozil remains one of the most classy playmakers the football world has seen. The 33-year-old won the 2014 FIFA World Cup with Germany, contributing a goal and an assist in the competition.Ozil was the top assist-provider at both the 2010 FIFA World Cup and Euro 2012 with three assists each. In his international career, the attacking midfielder has registered 40 assists in 92 appearances, averaging 0.43 assists per match.
Neymar made his international debut at the age of 18. The Brazilian forward has since become a vital player and is currently their second-highest goalscorer of all time with 74 goals.
With age, Neymar's role has modified more into a creator for his teammates. The 30-year-old attacker has so far created 52 goals in 119 national appearances.
USMNT schedule 2022
After missing out four years ago, the USA men's national team (USMNT) is back in the FIFA World Cup, having qualified for this year's tournament in Qatar.To get more news about VeboTV, you can visit vebobd.live official website.
The USMNT confirmed its place on the final day of regional World Cup qualification, backing in despite a road defeat to Costa Rica that wasn't nearly heavy enough to see the U.S. miss out for a second straight time.
Now, the U.S. men, coached by Gregg Berhalter, will gear up for play this November and December in Qatar, with their sights set on raising the bar of expectations. The young U.S. squad is a talented but inexperienced group, and this tournament will not only allow for redemption for 2018, but it will also set the stage for a massive 2026 World Cup that will be hosted on U.S. soil, where the team aims to make a deep run.
What makes the World Cup so difficult? One slip-up could mean an exit from the competition and a long, four-year wait to make amends. Below is the USA's schedule leading up to the tournament in Qatar, along with its complete World Cup schedule, including potential knockout round opponents.The United States, like all other World Cup participants, is playing matches over the course of the calendar year to gear up for November's World Cup to make sure the team is both match fit and in a good rhythm. Team chemistry at the World Cup is critically important, making these games vital.
Friendlies against World Cup participants Morocco and Uruguay were scheduled to lead into a pair of CONCACAF Nations League games against Grenada and El Salvador. For the September international break, a pair of friendlies against Japan and Saudi Arabia were set, both to be played in Europe. The Saudi Arabia match is booked for the Estadio Nueva Condomina in Murcia, Spain, and while the Japan friendly does not yet officially have a venue, though reports indicate it will take place in Germany.
European teams were not available for friendlies in June or September as they must fulfill UEFA Nations League fixtures during those international breaks. There is no international window scheduled for October as domestic leagues look to fulfill fixtures before the World Cup break (Nov. 14 through Dec. 18).Should the Stars & Stripes achieve that goal, the knockout round awaits. In the modern era of the tournament, the U.S. has only reached the quarterfinals of a World Cup once, in 2002 after a Round of 16 win over regional rivals Mexico. Therefore, winning a Round of 16 match would represent a historic first for the U.S. against a non-continental opponent.
Should the United States finish top two in Group B and qualify for the knockout stages, the U.S. would play a match against one of the qualifiers from Group A: host Qatar (No. 51), Netherlands (No. 10), African champions Senegal (No. 20), or Ecuador (No. 46).
While that group is difficult to predict, it also presents an opportunity for the United States. Since host Qatar was placed as the top-seeded team, as per FIFA World Cup tradition, that means the USA avoids other powerhouses such as Brazil, Belgium, and Spain, who are top seeds in other groups. The Netherlands and Senegal project to be the most difficult potential opponents in the Round of 16.If the U.S. manages to win Group B, it would face the second-place finisher from Group A in the knockout round, a tasty proposition. Should the U.S. finish second in Group B, the more predicted scenario given England's presence, it would face the Group A winner in the first knockout game. Oddsmakers have the Netherlands as the favorite.